Why financial advisors
fail to ask clients about charitable planning:
1. it's
not a priority
2. they're afraid of offending their clients and losing the
business
3. they're not that charitably inclined themselves and can't
envision clients giving away anything that shortchanges the kids or uses up
resources that might be needed later
4. planned
giving is sort of complex and has a lot of tax code issues to work through, why
bother to learn about such an obscure field when so few people do it?
5. they
assume their clients aren't charitable
6. they
say that the clients never asked about planned giving, so they didn't bring it up
7. advisors
worry about giving away money under management because it reduces their own
revenue stream, or they can’t figure out how a product or service they provide
can be worked into the planning process, so there’s no incentive to suggest it

8. most
don't know much about the many technical issues and avoid the topic so as to
not appear to be incompetent or unknowledgeable in front of their clients
9. they
don't want to do team planning with other experts because they will be giving
up control of their client if other advisors horn in on the planning process
10. clients
are fee sensitive, why should an advisor go spend money to learn something
they'll rarely use and probably can't bill for?
As it turns out, it is mostly
an education issue, but many experts feel that the client MUST say in front of
all of their advisors, “I want to make a gift; show me how to make it happen”, before
the advisor takes it seriously.
Until this happens, many advisors assume that the
client is using them as a fence or a barrier to keep charities and fundraisers
away from them. You know the lines, “my lawyer
doesn't think this is a good idea” or “my broker says I can't use the deduction,
maybe next year”, or “I'd probably do something later, but you know how it is
when your CPA says it's not a good time”, all excuses that make sense, but may
not be entirely accurate. Getting the
client to establish their goals and priorities early in the process makes it
easier to plan correctly, and it removes many of the objections that may pop up
later on in the planning process.
Many individuals are
receptive if they see how to give their support away tax efficiently and
develop some organized planning to their philanthropy. What will not work is having a charity
believe that it can deputize a tax, financial or legal advisor and make them
part of their fundraising or development office by pressuring them to go after
charitable gifts from their clients.
That cannot happen because commercial advisors need to be objective and
not bring an agenda to the table by promoting a specific charity. Instead, what can work is a better planning
partnership where both the values of the client and his or her financial goals
blend into an integrated estate plan.
Recent surveys have shown
that less than five percent of professional advisors* bring up the idea of
charitable planning in their discussions with clients, and many of those only
do so after the client introduces the topic.
The lack of charitable bequests in the estate planning process is a concern since over 70 per cent of families already make
annual charitable gifts, but less than six per cent do so from their wills or
trusts. Why is there a difference
between the two? It is probably faulty
communication between clients and their advisors, since clients make those
decisions to support charitable organizations based on their values and
interests, but fail to ask about continuing their legacy in discussions with
financial and legal advisors.
* unpublished data 2002 Marin County Community Foundation
© 2002 -- Vaughn W. Henry
Gift and Estate Planning Services -- Springfield,
IL 62703-5314
217.529.1958 -- 217.529.1959 fax VWHenry@aol.com
on the web at gift-estate.com

CONTACT US FOR A FREE
PRELIMINARY CASE STUDY FOR YOUR OWN CRT SCENARIO or try your own at Donor Direct. Please note -- there's much more to estate and charitable planning than simply running software calculations, but it does give you a chance to see how the calculations affect some of the design considerations. This is not "do it yourself brain surgery". When is a CRUT superior to a CRAT? Which type of CRT is best used with which assets? Although it may be counter-intuitive, sometimes a lower payout CRUT makes more sense and pays more total income to beneficiaries. Why? When to use a CLUT vs. CLAT and the traps in each lead trust. Which tools work best in which planning scenarios? Check with our office for solutions to this alphabet soup of planned giving tools.